Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Plot To Overturn NY Gay Marriage Foiled Again, Says Court Ruling


By

Rebecca Fishbein

Published Jul 7, 2012

Modified Jul 7, 2012


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .

Happy couples

 


By

Rebecca Fishbein

Published Jul 7, 2012

Modified Jul 7, 2012


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

Just over a year after New York State legalized same-sex marriage, lawmakers upstate have ruled that the state senate did not violate any state-mandated open meeting laws, upholding the Marriage Equality Act.

The ruling came after the (ironically-named?) conservative group New Yorkers For Constitutional Freedoms filed a lawsuit last year claiming that Governor Cuomo and Mayor Bloomberg held several illegal closed-door meetings with Republican majority members in the days leading up to the gay marriage vote. The group called for an overturn of the Marriage Equality Act, but yesterday, the Appellate Division of the state Supreme Court in Rochester ruled that the meetings neither violated the law nor warranted nullifying same-sex marriage, since private meetings between legislative caucuses and guests are legal under the Open Meetings Law.

"Today the New York State Appellate Court, Fourth Department upheld New York's Marriage Equality Act, which ensures that marriage is available to all New York couples regardless of sexual orientation," Governor Cuomo wrote in a statement yesterday in response to the ruling. "The court's decision affirms that in our state, there is marriage equality for all, and with this decision New York continues to stand as a progressive leader for the nation."

Meanwhile, members of the New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms, whose mission statement says the group "exists to influence legislation and legislators for the Lord Jesus Christ," plan to carry on their noble crusade against husband-and-husband cake toppers, despite the ruling. "The integrity of our legislative process is at stake, and it is worth defending," the group's executive director, Rev. Jason J. McGuire, said in a statement yesterday, proving once again that life just isn't fair, is it.

Tagged

Albany

bloomberg

Cuomo

gay marriage

lawsuit

marriage equality act

new yorkers for constitutional freedoms

rochester


Rebecca Fishbein

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

Queens mother charged with murdering her son after failed suicide attempt, NYPD says

Sukken Wong, 62, allegedly stabbed her nonverbal son, Byran Wong, 25, to death.

By

Brittany Kriegstein

Published Oct 23, 2026 at 8:01 a.m. ET


Your guide to voting in New York's 2026 elections for governor and Congress

A primer on the races for governor, attorney general and the congressional districts that could help determine control of the U.S. House.

By

Walter Wuthmann

,

Jon Campbell

and

Brigid Bergin

News

Your guide to voting in New York's 2026 elections for governor and Congress

A primer on the races for governor, attorney general and the congressional districts that could help determine control of the U.S. House.

By

Walter Wuthmann

,

Jon Campbell

and

Brigid Bergin


Forest Hills Stadium can keep its concerts under deal with neighbors

By

Ryan Kost

NYC Council to grill Mamdani officials on collapsed Hunts Point Produce Market deal

By

Elizabeth Kim

NYPD arrests 17-year-old in fatal Midtown subway platform shooting

By

Charles Lane


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .