Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Pivotal City Councilmember Comes Out Against 10-Story Office Building On St. Marks Place


By

Sydney Pereira

Published Mar 4, 2020


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .

Rendering of proposed office building at 3 St. Marks Place

 

ARCHITECT MORRIS ADJMI


By

Sydney Pereira

Published Mar 4, 2020


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

Developers seeking an air rights transfer on St. Marks Place to build a 10-story office complex failed to gain a key supporter to push their project forward on Wednesday.

City Councilmember Carlina Rivera officially came out against an air rights transfer that developers want in order to build a 10-story office complex at St. Marks Place and Third Avenue in the East Village.

Used by developers as a way to build denser structures, air rights transfers allow landmarked buildings to sell undeveloped square footage to a nearby lot, in part to raise money for the upkeep of historic buildings.

The developers, Real Estate Equities Corporation [REEC], applied for the air rights transfer from the landmarked Hamilton-Holly House at 4 St. Marks Place to a property across the street, at 3 St. Marks Place. The Landmarks Preservation Commission has already approved the air rights transfer, and the request is currently winding through the city's public review process, which ends with a City Council vote where Rivera holds a pivotal role as the local councilmember.

"St. Marks Place holds a very special place in our community," Rivera told Gothamist. "Many people call it the 'Gateway to the East Village.'"

"In this case, the permit the developer is applying for and the additional air rights they're requesting and [the building's] relationship to the surrounding streetscape and the landmark—they were troubling to me given the stipulations of the permit," Rivera said, referring to the specific zoning provision 74-79. "I know I need to come out and recommend that [the City Planning Commission] vote to reject this."

The air rights transfer would allow for developers to build by 8,386 square feet larger, to 10-stories tall—about 20 percent larger than what the developers could build without special approvals, or as-of-right.

REEC plans to pay the owners of the landmarked building, where Alexander Hamilton's son once lived, $4 million for the development rights. Five percent of that, or about $200,000, would be dedicated for future maintenance of the landmark. The company has previously said it has already contributed about half-a-million dollars towards restoration.

At Wednesday's public hearing, the project's architect Morris Adjmi emphasized a building of a similar height size could be built as-of-right, saying, "one could build this building without a special permit, without transferring any air rights, and it is 22 feet taller at the street wall and also more or less the same height overall."

Architect Morris Adjmi shows different options for the building at 3 St. Marks Place. The center is as-of-right.

City Planning Commission Public Hearing On March 4, 2020

A rep for the developers, Adam Taubman of the law firm Kramer Levin, also said at the hearing the currently vacant lot would see construction whether or not the permit is approved.

Rivera maintained her position that the proposal doesn't meet stipulations under 74-79 for more than 8,300-square-feet of additional development rights.

"We were very clear in that we did not find enough community support and given the stipulations of the permit, we just told [the developers] that we didn't really see a way forward," Rivera said. She added: "As it stands today, [the landmark] is already in excellent condition with significant repairs made in very recent years."

The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation has been fighting the project for months—seeing the development as an extension of rising office developments in the East Village, such as the under-construction 21-story "Tech Hub" on 14th Street (which Rivera supported).

"We have said from the beginning that this proposal to increase the size of the planned tech office tower at the "gateway to the East Village" is wrong, and would only serve to accelerate the spread of ‘Midtown South’ and Silicon Alley to this neighborhood," Andrew Berman, the group's executive director, wrote in an email. "With Councilmember Rivera’s stated opposition today, we are optimistic that the air rights transfer can and will be defeated."

Rivera submitted joint testimony with Assemblymember Deborah Glick and State Senator Brad Hoylman, who have previously expressed opposition, urging the commission to deny the application. They called the development "out of context" with the landmark as well as "the surrounding streetscape and character" in written testimony.

The City Planning Commission will hold a vote at a future meeting after deliberating on testimony from a public hearing Wednesday. REEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Rivera's opposition.

This article has been updated to clarify how air rights transfers work.

Tagged

east village

office development

ulurp

st marks place

carlina rivera


Sydney Pereira

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

After Trump defunding, thousands losing rental assistance in NYC may finally have relief

The Trump administration issued new guidance outlining a plan to replace expiring rental assistance vouchers with a new program.

By

David Brand

Published Oct 6, 2026 at 6:30 a.m. ET


Blind man dismissed from grand jury duty can sue NY for discrimination, judge rules

Albert Elia accused officials of "systemic discrimination" against blind people looking to serve on juries.

By

Samantha Max

News

Blind man dismissed from grand jury duty can sue NY for discrimination, judge rules

Albert Elia accused officials of "systemic discrimination" against blind people looking to serve on juries.

By

Samantha Max


Gatorade recall affects drinks sold in New York and New Jersey

By

Giulia Heyward

Gov. Hochul declares upstate NY measles outbreak a ‘disaster emergency’

By

Caroline Lewis

NYPD detective forced to retire after false statements in Brooklyn investigation

By

Charles Lane


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .