Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

One of NJ’s richest towns is once again denied its request to delay building affordable housing


By

Mike Hayes

Published Oct 9, 2024


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .

A rendering of rental apartments planned for Millburn, New Jersey's Main Street.

 

RDM Group, rendering from plans submitted to Millburn Township


By

Mike Hayes

Published Oct 9, 2024


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

New Jersey’s state courts have shot down an effort from Millburn Township to delay the start of construction of what’s become a contentious affordable housing development in its downtown.

The latest turn in Millburn's ongoing court battle began in August, when a state judge ordered town officials to move forward with building a 75-unit, 100% affordable housing project that would replace a public works building near the town's center. Millburn's attorneys appealed that decision, arguing it has yet to find a site for a new public works facility, even though it's already purchased property to do so. But the appeals court ruled that the town failed to show it would suffer hardship by proceeding with the judge's order.

The affordable housing project's developer, RPM, has now asked the judge to issue a restraining order barring the town from using the property it recently purchased “for any purpose other than for relocation of its [Department of Public Works] Operations.”

In a recent court filing, RPM produced documents showing the town received a $200,000 grant from the state to help purchase the new land. Those documents show that Millburn officials plan to temporarily move the public works operations to the site, located at 22 East Willow St., so that the downtown property could be redeveloped.

Essex County Superior Court Judge Cynthia Santomauro on Monday granted RPM’s request for a hearing on the restraining order, scheduling it for Halloween.

Millburn Mayor Annette Romano and members of the township committee did not respond to requests to be interviewed for this story.

The town’s public information officer Kristina Sternesky said in a written statement that township officials are “extremely disappointed” with the appeals court’s decision to deny its appeal. She insisted that the township “has not been able to identify a suitable alternative site for the future home” of Millburn’s public works operations, and said the facility’s relocation “could cause catastrophic disruption of services, including emergency accessibility and response.”

Sternesky and town officials did not respond to questions about the $200,000 the town received from the state.

Gothamist has chronicled the ongoing fight over the affordable apartment complex in Millburn Township, where homes go for more than $1 million on average. The dispute became heated earlier this year after the township committee voted to rescind its development agreement for the RPM project after years of defying court orders.

In August, Santomauro ordered the town to honor its original deal with RPM and threatened sanctions, including fines, if the town continued to block the project. Since then, Millburn’s defiance on the affordable housing issue has only increased. In September, it joined eight other New Jersey towns in a lawsuit seeking to invalidate a state law passed earlier this year that establishes guidelines for how much low-priced housing each town must develop in the future.

Their resistance to affordable housing comes as the state prepares to hand down mandates to towns for the number of affordable housing units each town has to develop over the next decade.

Josh Bauers, an attorney for the nonprofit Fair Share Housing Center, said Millburn’s appeal was “bogus” and premature. He said the township’s request was denied, in part, because under New Jersey law the litigation cannot be appealed until the trial court judge issues their final judgment in the case. Once the court finishes its work, the township will then have the right to appeal, he said.

Sternesky, Milburn's spokesperson, said the town intends to appeal again at a later date.

“We're hopeful that they will not do that, and instead will stop trying to delay the site and actually allow it to get constructed," Bauers said.

Santomauro has so far been unmoved by Millburn’s concerns about moving its public works facility at 9 Main St., which includes a salt dome for the roads and a gas station for fueling town utility vehicles. At a hearing in July, the judge cited a 2007 study the township commissioned, calling the public works facility a “deleterious and largely obsolete land use within the heart of Millburn’s central business district” and “detrimental to the overall health and welfare of the community.”

The fact that the town has yet to move the facilities did not undermine its own conclusion that the site should be redeveloped, the judge said.

According to the court documents, the $200,000 state grant supplements a $2.5 million purchase of property at 22 East Willow St.

Under the "objectives" section of the town’s application describing how the property would be used, Millburn officials wrote: “Portions of the Township of Millburn Department of Public Works operations will be relocated out of the downtown area of the Township due to redevelopment. The Township will require a property where these operations can be relocated and continued. The Township will also require an area to house certain DPW-related equipment, vehicles and materials.”

The documents show the township also committed to issue a bond for the additional $2.3 million to purchase the property and that it was acquired in April.

After the documents came to light this week, Millburn’s attorneys sent a letter to the court arguing that the developer didn’t have the right to tell them where to move the public works site or what to do with the property.

Tagged

new jersey

housing


Mike Hayes

Mike Hayes covers equity and access to opportunity in New Jersey. He joined WNYC and Gothamist in 2023. Before that, he worked as a freelance journalist writing about policing and criminal justice. He has written for ProPublica, CNN, HuffPost, BuzzFeed News and The Appeal. He is also the author of the book, “The Secret Files: Bill De Blasio, The NYPD, and the Broken Promises of Police Reform.” In 2019, he was a finalist for the Livingston Award for Young Journalists.

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

The NYPD is confiscating e-bikes along a clogged East Village street

The action follows complaints from merchants and neighbors about blocked sidewalks and curbs.

By

Willow Higgins

Published Oct 29, 2026 at 6:08 p.m. ET


New Yorkers enrolled in SNAP will get more money for fresh produce next year

Residents enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will receive 40% more through the Health Bucks program.

By

Giulia Heyward

News

New Yorkers enrolled in SNAP will get more money for fresh produce next year

Residents enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will receive 40% more through the Health Bucks program.

By

Giulia Heyward


'You can't even look out the window': Asbestos dust coats Brooklyn NYCHA building walls

By

Catalina Gonella

Trash containers take over Brooklyn parking spaces as NYC gets garbage bags off sidewalks

By

Liam Quigley

Mamdani says he's 'confident' NYC will collect $500 million with pied-à-terre tax

By

Elizabeth Kim

and

David Brand


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .