Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
NYC Right Of Way Law Ruled Unconstitutional
By
Emma Whitford
Published Jun 28, 2016
Modified Jun 28, 2016
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
Getty
By
Emma Whitford
Published Jun 28, 2016
Modified Jun 28, 2016
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
A Queens judge ruled on Friday that the Right of Way Law, which empowers beat cops to charge reckless drivers who kill or injure pedestrians walking with the right of way, is unconstitutional.
Queens Criminal Court Judge Gia Morris released the ruling on Friday in favor of Isaac Sanson, a school bus driver who fatally struck 85-year-old Jeanine Deutsch in December 2014 as she crossed the street in Forest Hills. Sanson was one of the first NYC drivers to be charged with the Right of Way law, which made failure to yield a misdemeanor offense carrying maximum penalties of a $500 fine and 30 days in jail.
Previously, unless an NYPD officer witnessed the crash, drivers had to be intoxicated or break numerous laws in order to face consequences.
In her ruling, Morris argued that because drivers can be charged under the Right of Way law even if their intentionality or awareness of committing a violent act can't be proven, the law violates Sanson's due process.
"The very fabric of our criminal justice system is that an accused person stands before a court innocent until proven guilty, and is entitled to significant constitutional protections separate and distinct from a civil case,” Morris wrote.
It's true that the vast majority of criminal convictions hinge on a court's assessment of the perpetrator's mental state—whether he was aware of, or intentional about, the crime. Whereas in civil cases, a judge must only decide that the perpetrator failed to be "reasonably prudent."
But safe streets advocates argue that the same burden of proof applied to failure to yield also applies to drunk driving, also a criminal offense.
"There is absolutely no awareness of wrongdoing that is required in order to hold someone who strikes a pedestrian while driving drunk criminally liable," attorney Steve Vaccaro, a safe streets advocate who represents victims of traffic violence, told Streetsblog this week. "All that needs to be shown is that the person is in a state of intoxication and that the person's car hit another, period."
Responding to Judge Morris's ruling on Thursday, Transportation Alternatives director Paul Steely White pointed out that the Right of Way law was amended last fall, to explicitly define the driver's responsibility as "that care which is exercised by a reasonably prudent driver." The amendment was part of a settlement with Transportation Workers Local 100, which sued the city after six MTA bus drivers were arrested and charged with misdemeanors for failing to exercise due care and fatally striking pedestrians.
"The reference to civil negligence standards in the statute itself makes unmistakable that City Council members who adopted [the Right of Way law] intended to apply criminal penalties based on a civil negligence standard," he stated. "Judge Morris’ decision fails to acknowledge that legislators can and do apply criminal penalties based on negligence."
Mayor de Blasio's office issued a statement Tuesday indicating that the city will continue to enforce the Right Of Way Law, regardless of this ruling.
"[The law] is a vital tool to hold accountable drivers who seriously injure or kill pedestrians with the right of way while driving dangerously," said a de Blasio spokesperson. "This is an important piece of Vision Zero’s comprehensive approach to reducing death and serious injury on the streets. We disagree with the court’s non-binding decision and will continue to investigate, enforce, and charge this law."
Queens DA Richard Brown told Streetsblog that his office is considering an appeal stating, "We are studying the decision and weighing our appellate options."
Setting aside the question of its constitutionality, reports suggest that the Right of Way law has been underutilized. According to a report issued by Transportation Alternatives last December, drivers who failed to yield caused 5,966 crashes resulting in death or injury last year. In that same time period, only 24 drivers were charged.
Tagged
civil penalty
criminality
gia morris
hit and run
isaac sanson
unconstitutional
Emma Whitford
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
NYC Council to consider earlier Legionella reporting after deadly outbreaks
A bill facing a hearing Monday would require cooling tower owners to notify city health officials when bacteria levels reach a much lower threshold.
By
Catalina Gonella
Published Oct 18, 2026 at 7:36 p.m. ET
Staten Island fire injures 2, but spares historic 'Godfather' church
Dozens of firefighters responded to the blaze, which started in a vacant warehouse. It was contained within three hours.
By
Giulia Heyward
News
Staten Island fire injures 2, but spares historic 'Godfather' church
Dozens of firefighters responded to the blaze, which started in a vacant warehouse. It was contained within three hours.
By
Giulia Heyward
Bail reform remains major issue in NY governor's race, 7 years after it became law
By
Gino Fanelli
NYPD identifies Bronx man, 26, killed in Midtown subway shooting
By
Ryan Kost
,
Elizabeth Kim
and
Phil Corso
Have you seen this Yorkie? NYPD looking for adorable pup dognapped from her Queens home
By
Ryan Kost
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .