Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
New York’s early vote-by-mail law withstands 2nd legal challenge
By
Brigid Bergin
Published May 9, 2024
Modified May 9, 2024
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
By
Brigid Bergin
Published May 9, 2024
Modified May 9, 2024
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
New York Republicans have a new early voting problem.
The state’s recently enacted early vote-by-mail law will remain on the books — at least for now — after a mid-level appeals court issued a decision on Thursday in a case brought by Rep. Elise Stefanik, who chairs the House Republican Conference and is New York's highest-ranking congressional Republican, along with other elected officials and voters.
The ruling upheld a lower court decision that found that the new law is constitutional. The judges in the case also determined that the law could be implemented through legislation rather than a constitutional amendment as Stefanik and the other plaintiffs argue.
“The fact remains that, in its current form, the NY constitution contains no requirement — express or implied — mandating that voting occur in-person on Election Day,” justices from the Appellate Division Third Department said in their opinion.
The ruling comes as New York Republicans struggle to compete with Democrats in all forms of early voting. In the first real test of the new early vote-by-mail law in the state's closely watched special election in the 3rd Congressional District in Queens and Long Island in February, a Gothamist analysis found that twice as many Democrats cast early mail ballots as Republicans did. Higher turnout among Democrats during early voting was a key factor in propelling Democrat Tom Suozzi to victory.
Stefanik filed the lawsuit in September in state Supreme Court in Albany on the same day that Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the early vote-by-mail bill into law. It allows any voter to request a mail ballot without selecting one of the prescribed excuses previously required by absentee ballots, such as being away from home, being sick or having a disability. A lower court ruled the law was constitutional in February, and Stefanik appealed the decision.
Stefanik said she plans to appeal Thursday's ruling to the state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals.
“On behalf of all New Yorkers concerned with New York Democrats' illegal and unconstitutional assault on election integrity in New York State, today’s ruling by the Appellate Division is shameful and unconstitutional,” Stefanik said in a statement. “The New York state constitution couldn't be clearer: If you would like to alter the legal absentee ballot process, it must be decided on by the voters through a constitutional amendment.”
The state attorney general's office did not respond to requests for comment.
Hochul's spokesperson Avi Small called Thursday's decision "a critical step to ensure more eligible New Yorkers can exercise their fundamental right to vote."
"While right-wing extremists across the country try to undermine fair and free elections, Gov. Hochul is fighting to strengthen voting rights and protect the democratic process,” Small said.
In 2021, voters rejected a constitutional ballot that would have permitted so-called “no-excuse” absentee ballots. The amendment asked voters whether the constitution’s absentee ballot provision should remove the requirement that someone indicate the reason they were unable to vote in person. That measure failed after the New York Republican and Conservative parties led a multimillion-dollar ad campaign urging voters to “just vote no.”
In their ruling, the Appellate Court justices acknowledged the failure of that ballot amendment while noting that their analysis found that the proposal never needed to go before voters as a ballot measure. “There has been no express provision in the constitution mandating in-person voting since Jan. 1, 1967,” they wrote.
“That the [state] Legislature, in first proposing the amendment in 2019, may have assumed that a constitutional amendment was necessary to implement universal mail-in voting does not make it so," the justices added.
The opinion also rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that the Legislature went beyond its authority in passing this law. The justices said the state constitution “grants the Legislature broad, plenary powers to prescribe the manner in which voting is to occur.”
Tagged
new york state
democracy
new york city
voting
courts
Politics
Brigid Bergin
Brigid Bergin is an award-winning senior reporter on the People and Power desk. She is fiercely committed to telling stories that help people engage and support democracy. In 2022, she hosted a live, ten-week call-in politics show ahead of the midterm elections called The People's Guide to Power. Brigid's reporting in 2017 included some of the first coverage of a political newcomer now known as AOC. In 2016, she broke the news of a voter purge in Brooklyn just days before New York’s presidential primary, triggering city, state and federal investigations. Brigid also guest hosts The Brian Lehrer Show and All Of It. She graduated from the University at Albany and the CUNY Newmark School of Journalism. Got a tip? Email [email protected] or Signal 917-723-4719.
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
Deer are all over New Jersey roads looking for sex, state officials warn
Mid-October through mid-December is deer mating season, which can be a danger to drivers as the sex-seeking creatures cross roadways throughout the Garden State.
By
Rosemary Misdary
Published Oct 16, 2026 at 4:22 p.m. ET
Man messaged 'I got straight poison' before giving NYC college students fentanyl, feds say
A transcript from an April court hearing sheds new light on what transpired at Fashion Institute of Technology.
By
Samantha Max
News
Man messaged 'I got straight poison' before giving NYC college students fentanyl, feds say
A transcript from an April court hearing sheds new light on what transpired at Fashion Institute of Technology.
By
Samantha Max
Inside the plan to fix the nearly collapsed Pfizer Building, 1/64th of an inch at a time
By
David Brand
School bus carrying autistic students got lost in Brooklyn for 4 hours last year
By
Jessica Gould
NYC’s bridges can last 'forever,' if we take care of them
By
Clayton Guse
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .