Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Mayor Adams wants immigration officers back on Rikers. Can he do that?


By

Arun Venugopal

Published Feb 19, 2025


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .

A sign reads "RIKERS ISLAND."

 

José A. Alvarado Jr. for Gothamist


By

Arun Venugopal

Published Feb 19, 2025


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

Mayor Eric Adams announced last week that he is preparing an executive order that would welcome U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement agents back to Rikers Island, but it’s unclear if he can unilaterally overrule the city law that removed the agents from the jail complex more than a decade ago.

The declaration, announced after a meeting with President Donald Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan on Thursday, was short on details. But immigrant advocates greeted it with derision — including Elora Mukherjee, the director of the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, who said, “The mayor cannot with the stroke of a pen change our city laws by himself."

But City Councilmembers Robert Holden and Vickie Paladino applauded the move, with Holden saying Adams should have acted sooner and Paladino calling it "a great move by Mayor Adams." But the accommodation also raised a question about executive action: Does Adams have the power to do what he says he’ll do?

The answer is hardly certain, based on the few particulars provided by the mayor, policy experts and practitioners close to the issue. They said a clearer picture would emerge when the executive order, in all its detail, is issued.

Here’s what to know right now about Adam’s plan, announced after his meeting with Homan, who leads the White House’s pledged “mass deportation” initiative.

What did the mayor say he would do?

Adams said in a two-paragraph statement he is preparing an executive order to allow ICE agents to operate on Rikers Island.

The statement was widely rebuked, with critics saying the action amounted to a quid pro quo whereby Adams traded his support for the White House’s crackdown on illegal immigration in exchange for the Department of Justice’s pending dismissal of federal corruption charges against him.

The mayor has previously been critical of the city’s sanctuary city protections, and has complained that the measures go too far in shielding repeat offenders from immigration enforcement.

The mayor's statement last week didn’t elaborate on the scope of the ICE officers’ collaboration with city personnel, except to say the federal officials would assist the city’s Correction Intelligence Bureau “in their criminal investigations,” in particular those focused on violent criminals and gangs.

The bureau, among other tasks, investigates all new criminal conduct committed by incarcerated individuals or visitors to city jails. Bureau investigators work closely with prosecutors in all five boroughs, to present criminal investigations for prosecution.

How does the change Adams wants square up with existing city law?

A 2014 law specifically bars ICE from Rikers Island. It is part of a package of sanctuary city measures authorized by past mayors and City Councils over several decades.

Together the measures generally restrict the use of city personnel and resources in the enforcement of immigration law, which under the U.S. Constitution is a federal obligation.

However, the 2014 law included a loophole of sorts. It provides that a mayor may, by executive order, authorize immigration authorities to maintain an office on Rikers Island “for purposes unrelated to the enforcement of civil immigration laws.”

Does this mean the change sought by Adams would hold up to a legal challenge?

It’s unclear – and no one has filed a legal challenge at this point.

Louis Cholden-Brown, who worked as an attorney in the City Council when the 2014 sanctuary law was passed, said “the devil is in the details,” which Adams' statement lacked.

“On the face of this 2014 law, an executive order (by Adams) could be lawful,” Cholden-Brown said. “But time will tell what exact verbiage and authority the mayor seeks to invoke in that executive order. Certainly it remains a possibility that the executive order will attempt to exceed the bounds of what power was retained for the mayoralty.”

Neal D. Frishberg, an attorney in private practice whose clients have included immigrants at risk of deportation, took note of the 2014 loophole allowing ICE to remain on Rikers Island for purposes unrelated to civil immigration law enforcement, pending a future executive order.

But he was unconvinced the order envisioned by Adams was lawful.

“ I don't know what other reason ICE could possibly be on Rikers, other than enforcement of civil immigration laws,” said Frishberg. “If you're ICE, what else are you doing?”

The Adams statement doesn’t detail what restrictions would be in place for the ICE officers working on Rikers.

So ICE operated on Rikers until 2014. What prompted the change?

Peter Markowitz, a professor of law at Cardozo Law School and co-director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, said the law was prompted by the federal government’s efforts to “draft states and localities” into the business of immigration law enforcement, which the courts have said is the job of the federal government.

“The mayor (Bill de Blasio) and most importantly the speaker at the time, Melissa Mark-Viverito, were very interested in making crystal clear that New York is not in the deportation game,” Markowitz said.

Phil Desgranges,  the attorney in charge of criminal law reform at the Legal Aid Society, said the issues at Rikers included cases where unauthorized immigrants were accused of crimes, acquitted of those offenses, and who were placed into deportation proceedings anyway – because they were encountered by ICE officers operating in the jails

“And instances like that, I think really troubled New Yorkers,” Desgranges said. “It troubled the Legislature, and the City Council put in place protections to ensure that people would not just be summarily removed from the country because of an allegation.”

Trump signed legislation last month also targeting unauthorized immigrants awaiting trial – at Rikers and other detention facilities. What’s that about?

Trump signed legislation – the first of his second term – requiring the federal detention of unauthorized immigrants arrested or charged with theft and violent crimes.

The Laken Riley Act was passed with bipartisan support in Congress, with 46 Democrats in the House and 12 Democrats in the Senate supporting the measure.

ABC News, citing a government document, said the new law “would be impossible for ICE to implement” within existing resources and could cost $27 billion in the first year.

Opponents of the measure argue it could also lead to deportations of immigrants who have not been convicted of crimes.

What comes next in New York?

Kayla Mamelak, a spokesperson for Adams, said there is no imminent date for the executive order to be issued. But she added it would be soon.

Cholden-Brown said councilmembers could simply pass a law that invalidates any actions undertaken by Adams.

Alternatively, however, the matter would end up in court.

“Obviously, there's legal authorities that are looking at whether or not there should be a sort of lawsuit,” said Melissa Mark-Viverito, who served as speaker of the City Council that passed the 2014 law. “And I hope that there is one.”

Tagged

new york city

Asylum Seekers

public safety

Race And Justice Unit

Politics

eric adams


Arun Venugopal

Twitter

Arun Venugopal is a senior reporter for the WNYC and Gothamist Race & Justice Unit who focuses on issues of race and bias in our region. His reporting also tackles the topics of immigration, faith, and inequality. Arun serves as the regular fill-in host of the station's "U.S. of Anxiety" program. Arun was the creator and host of Micropolis, a series about race and identity. He is a contributor to NPR's Morning Edition and All Things Considered. He has appeared on PBS Newshour, On the Media and Studio 360, and has been published in The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal and Salon. He also frequently serves as an emcee and moderator of panel discussions on race, religion, and identity issues and has been a guest host of NPR's "Fresh Air." He lives with his family in Queens.

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

Deer are all over New Jersey roads looking for sex, state officials warn

Mid-October through mid-December is deer mating season, which can be a danger to drivers as the sex-seeking creatures cross roadways throughout the Garden State.

By

Rosemary Misdary

Published Oct 16, 2026 at 4:22 p.m. ET


Man messaged 'I got straight poison' before giving NYC college students fentanyl, feds say

A transcript from an April court hearing sheds new light on what transpired at Fashion Institute of Technology.

By

Samantha Max

News

Man messaged 'I got straight poison' before giving NYC college students fentanyl, feds say

A transcript from an April court hearing sheds new light on what transpired at Fashion Institute of Technology.

By

Samantha Max


Inside the plan to fix the nearly collapsed Pfizer Building, 1/64th of an inch at a time

By

David Brand

School bus carrying autistic students got lost in Brooklyn for 4 hours last year

By

Jessica Gould

NYC’s bridges can last 'forever,' if we take care of them

By

Clayton Guse


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .