Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Dumping Nemo: Is Weather Channel's Blizzard Branding Just Nomenclatural Tryanny?


By

John Del Signore

Published Feb 8, 2013

Modified Feb 8, 2013


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .


By

John Del Signore

Published Feb 8, 2013

Modified Feb 8, 2013


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

A bitter debate is raging in some circles over the Weather Channel's wildly successful campaign to name winter storms. When the Georgia-based network first announced its intention to name storms last fall, many meteorologists objected to the scheme, with NBC's Andrew Freiden wondering who died and made TWC corporate king of christening weather. As WJLA-TV’s Bob Ryan pointed out, "there was NO coordination of this decision to name winter storms with the National Weather Service or any of the professional groups such as the Weather Coalition, groups within the AMS or NWA."

Yep, the Weather Channel just went ahead and did it, like Colonel Kurtz ordering the assassination of Vietnamese double agents and amassing a Montagnard army of stupidly-named soldiers. And it fucking worked. Everyone from Mayor Bloomberg to, uh, local website Gothamist.com has been calling our current Nor'Easter "Nemo"... exactly as the Weather Channel Overlords expected. In an email, DCist's Benjamin Freed shakes his fist for many of us:

From a news perspective, this is particularly troubling. Hurricane and tropical storm names are issued by the National Weather Service and can thus be used universally without any editorial hesitation. Katrina is always Katrina, Sandy is always Sandy, and so forth. But when The Weather Channel takes it upon itself to "name" winter storms, it is doing nothing more than cashing in on that naming convention for its own purposes, and any other news organization that uses them without attributing it to The Weather Channel is simply doing free publicity for a marketing stunt. Until storm names become official record, it's just a cheap ploy for TV ratings.

And Dr. Joel N. Myers, AccuWeather Founder and President, has this to say:

In unilaterally deciding to name winter storms, The Weather Channel has confused media spin with science and public safety. We have explored this issue for 20 years and have found that this is not good science and will mislead the public. Winter storms are very different from hurricanes.

Hurricanes are well-defined storms following a path that can be tracked. Winter storms are often erratic, affecting different areas unevenly. Their centers may not be well-defined. There may be multiple centers and they often shift. One area may get a blizzard, while places not too far away may experience rain or fog, or nothing at all. Naming a winter storm that may deliver such varied weather will create more confusion in the public and the emergency management community.

The names, which are assigned in alphabetical order, include such gems as Orko, Q, Gandolf and Freyer—which, as Gothamist commenter "Robert Moses Supposes Erroneously" astutely points out, "were apparently picked out by an 8th grade D&D team." In an interview with the Times, Bryan Norcross, the channel meteorologist who helped conceive the storm-naming last year, explains that "Nemo is a Latin word" meaning "no one” or “no man.” He insists that “Finding Nemo" was not the inspiration for the name. Yeah, and Apocalypse Now totally wasn't inspired by Heart of Darkness.

Tagged

Blizzard

nemo


John Del Signore

Twitter

Originally from the Albany area, John Del Signore has called NYC home since 1995. In addition to his thousands of meticulously-crafted bespoke blog posts for Gothamist, his writing has also been published in The Awl, Deadspin, The Nervous Breakdown, and performed at The Brick Theater in Brooklyn.

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

Early Addition: There's finally stuff inside the Times Square tower where the ball drops

Because it used to sit vacant for most of the year, here are your early links: Rangers goalie scored, "It's a Wonderful Life" coming to Broadway, there's dignity in scaffolding and more.

By

James Ramsay

Published Oct 2, 2026 at 9:20 a.m. ET


NYC subway dragging death highlights an old school MTA failsafe

The man dragged to death by a subway train in Brooklyn earlier this week put riders across the city on edge.

By

Ramsey Khalifeh

News

NYC subway dragging death highlights an old school MTA failsafe

The man dragged to death by a subway train in Brooklyn earlier this week put riders across the city on edge.

By

Ramsey Khalifeh


We were the victim': Brooklyn shelter's new CEO speaks after corruption scandal

By

Ryan Kost

Badly burned body found in a trashed and abandoned Jamaica Queens lot, NYPD says

By

Brittany Kriegstein

Brooklyn DA brings back warrant-clearing event as quality-of-life tickets surge

By

Ben Feuerherd


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .