Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
Appeals court turns away GOP challenge to NY absentee ballot laws
By
Jon Campbell
and
Brigid Bergin
Published Nov 1, 2022
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
Mary Altaffer/AP/Shutterstock
By
Jon Campbell
and
Brigid Bergin
Published Nov 1, 2022
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
A state appeals court reversed a Republican-led challenge to New York’s absentee-voting laws, declining the party’s attempt to invalidate perhaps hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots.
The Appellate Division, Third Department, on Tuesday unanimously upheld a law allowing anyone to vote absentee if they’re afraid of catching or spreading an infectious disease, such as COVID-19. The law is set to remain in place through 2022.
The COVID-era voting law “was enacted in 2020 and has been in effect for multiple general, primary and special elections but petitioners did not challenge the statute until nine months after the sunset clause was extended and after the mailing of absentee ballots had already begun,” the unanimous, 10-page decision reads. “In short, petitioners delayed too long in bringing this proceeding/action.”
In its decision, the five-judge, mid-level court also upheld a 2021 law that changed when absentee ballots are opened. The new law requires local election officials to inspect the ballots and prepare them for counting prior to Election Day. Republicans argued the ballots should be counted afterward, as had been done for decades prior.
In short, petitioners delayed too long in bringing this proceeding/action.
Ruling from NY Appellate Division, Third Department
The Appellate Division again sided with Democrats because, among other reasons, Republicans waited too long to file their lawsuit, which the state GOP and state Conservative Party did in late September. The court’s ruling overturned a prior decision by state Supreme Court Justice Dianne Freestone, who had sided with Republicans.
In a statement, state Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat whose office represented the state in the case, said she was "happy with the decision to keep these commonsense election integrity initiatives in place."
Because the decision was unanimous, Republicans would likely have to seek permission from the Court of Appeals – the state’s top court – in order to appeal. In any event, time is running short: Election Day is in one week, and more and more absentee ballots are being canvassed each day.
The state Republican Party hasn't decided whether to try to appeal yet, according to a spokesperson.
"We are still reviewing the decision and will make a determination about action at the appropriate time but we maintain that the lower court was correct in ruling the law unconstitutional," spokesperson Jessica Proud said in a statement Wednesday.
Democrats and voting-rights advocates, including the New York Civil Liberties Union and Common Cause/NY, had accused Republicans of trying to sow chaos ahead of the Nov. 8 general election by casting doubt on the absentee ballot process.
As of Monday, more than 500,000 people had requested and received an absentee ballot in New York, according to the state Board of Elections. While the deadline to apply online for an absentee ballot has passed, a voter can still apply for an absentee ballot in person at a local BOE office through Monday, Nov. 7.
But Republicans argued that they were trying to protect their candidates’ rights. By changing when absentee ballots are opened, the party argued it restricted their ability to challenge specific ballots in court.
The Appellate Division, however, wasn’t having it. By overturning the rules in the middle of an election, it would have treated those absentee voters whose ballots were already counted differently from those whose ballot had yet to be counted.
“Such disparate treatment cannot be countenanced,” the judges wrote.
Justices John Egan, Michael Lynch, Sharon Aarons, Stan Pritzker and Lisa Fisher all concurred with the decision.
In a statement, state Democratic Chairman Jay Jacobs chastised Republicans for trying to "disenfranchise voters and undermine our elections."
"We applaud this decision, and as Democrats, we remain steadfast in defending against any efforts to subvert free and fair elections, and we will make sure every single voter's voice is heard this year and every year," Jacobs said.
This story has been updated with comments from New York Attorney General's Office, and the state Republican and Democratic parties.
Tagged
election day
Politics
new york
absentee ballots
Jon Campbell
Jon Campbell covers the New York State Capitol for WNYC and Gothamist. Prior to that, he covered the Capitol for more than a decade for the USA TODAY Network. He has twice earned the Walter T. Brown Memorial Award, an honor given annually by the Legislative Correspondents Association alumni for outstanding state government coverage. Jon grew up in the Buffalo area and graduated from the University at Albany. Got a tip? Email Jon at [email protected] or Signal at JonCampbellNY.90.
Read more
Brigid Bergin
Brigid Bergin is an award-winning senior reporter on the People and Power desk. She is fiercely committed to telling stories that help people engage and support democracy. In 2022, she hosted a live, ten-week call-in politics show ahead of the midterm elections called The People's Guide to Power. Brigid's reporting in 2017 included some of the first coverage of a political newcomer now known as AOC. In 2016, she broke the news of a voter purge in Brooklyn just days before New York’s presidential primary, triggering city, state and federal investigations. Brigid also guest hosts The Brian Lehrer Show and All Of It. She graduated from the University at Albany and the CUNY Newmark School of Journalism. Got a tip? Email [email protected] or Signal 917-723-4719.
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
Hochul names NY AG James as special prosecutor on alleged rape case at Cornell University
The governor said she does not have faith that the police and the Tompkins County DA effectively investigated the case.
By
Jon Campbell
Published Oct 1, 2026 at 9:04 p.m. ET
Founder of NYC LGBTQ therapy practice charged with rape after alleged sexual assaults
Joseph LoGiudice is the second therapist at Liberation Psychotherapy to be accused of sexually abusing a patient.
By
Giulia Heyward
News
Founder of NYC LGBTQ therapy practice charged with rape after alleged sexual assaults
Joseph LoGiudice is the second therapist at Liberation Psychotherapy to be accused of sexually abusing a patient.
By
Giulia Heyward
US judge in NY indefinitely blocks ICE from making arrests at immigration courthouses
By
Arya Sundaram
Lawyer challenging NYC rent freeze releases Mamdani officials’ emails and text messages
By
David Brand
Push to strengthen NY sexual assault laws gathers steam after Cornell rape allegations
By
Walter Wuthmann
and
Jon Campbell
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .