Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
Arts & Entertainment
No Suit For You! Judge Tosses Seinfeld Defamation Case
By
Garth Johnston
Published Feb 25, 2011
Modified Feb 25, 2011
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Garth Johnston
Published Feb 25, 2011
Modified Feb 25, 2011
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Our long national nightmare is over. Today a judge threw out a multi-million dollar defamation suit against Jerry Seinfeld in regards to statements he said about an author suing his wife over her "cookbook" Deceptively Delicious. So we're all clear: Jerry Seinfeld does not really think that the woman who claimed his wife was a plagiarist was an wacky assassin? Okay?
A quick review! Jerry Seinfeld's wife Jessica wrote a cookbook about tricking your kids into eating good-for-them foods which hit stores in 2008. Author Missy Chase Lapine felt the book was too close to her own book, The Sneaky Chef, which had been rejected twice by Seinfeld's publisher and so sued, claiming plagiarism. Then Jerry said some disparaging things about Lapine to David Letterman on national television (without naming Lapine, he called her a "wacko" and then elaborated “I have wackos, you have wackos. And, you know, if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins. Mark David Chapman. And you know, James Earl Ray. So that's my concern.”). Eventually the plagiarism suit got thrown out of court and so Lapine sued again, this time over the Letterman remarks. Got that? Good. Because now it is all over.
In a ruling today Justice Marcy Friedman found nothing to go on in Lapine's suit. "Seinfeld, a well-known comedian, made the statements in question primarily on the Letterman show, a late-night entertainment program, during a comedic interchange between Seinfeld and Letterman. The interchange was repeatedly punctuated by laughter from the audience," she wrote. Further, she points out that "Seinfeld's statements disparage Lapine's claims of plagiarism as false or baseless or, more colloquially, wacky. As statements of opinion about the lack of merit of [Lapine's] claims, they are not actionable."
Of course it isn't over until Newman delivers the mail, so naturally Lapine's lawyers is considering "the options of a possible appeal." Somewhere, in some fictional New York, Jackie Chiles is mumbling "That's totally inappropriate. It's lewd, vesivius, salacious, outrageous!"
Tagged
defamation
jerry seinfeld
jessica seinfeld
lawsuits
missy chase lapine
Garth Johnston
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE arts-entertainment
Inside a photographer's journey to visit every neighborhood in New York City
What do you see when you record the whole of the boroughs?
By
Sonia Rao
Published Oct 5, 2026
Banned books and Winnie the Pooh: October in NYC libraries
It's a busy month at the branches.
By
Alec Hamilton
Arts & Entertainment
Banned books and Winnie the Pooh: October in NYC libraries
It's a busy month at the branches.
By
Alec Hamilton
NYC music in October: The Strokes, a Blink-182 cover band, and Polish experimentalism
By
Hank Shteamer
Are you a New Yorker? The Department of New Yorker Verification will now decide.
By
Hannah Frishberg
In the mood for a pastoral autumn experience? Try Queens.
By
Elizabeth Shwe
and
James Ramsay
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .