Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

City Threatens To Revoke Permit For Controversial Upper West Side Tower


By

Elizabeth Kim

Published Jan 18, 2019

Modified Jan 18, 2019


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .

Rendering of 50 West 66th Street by architecture firm Snøhetta

 


By

Elizabeth Kim

Published Jan 18, 2019

Modified Jan 18, 2019


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

In a blow to New York "supertall" developers, the city’s Department of Buildings is threatening to revoke the permit for a 775-foot condominium tower on the Upper West Side, citing both a controversial design feature as well as safety concerns.

Developed by Extell, the proposed building at 50 West 66th Street was to have included a 160-foot “mechanical void,” or empty spaces between several floors that would allow penthouses to sit higher, thereby adding to their value. The building, which is slated to hold 127 condominium units, would be the tallest on the Upper West Side and boast commanding views of Central Park.

On Thursday night, the DOB explained the issue in a statement to Gothamist:

"DOB determined that the 160-foot void proposed for this building is not customarily found in residential buildings, and so is contrary to the Zoning Resolution. In addition, we have raised objections, which the developer has not addressed, that occupants of the building may not be able to get from one emergency stairway to the other, as is required, within the proposed void."

Extell, which is both credited and maligned for starting the supertall boom with its Midtown luxury building known as One57, now has 15 days from January 14th in which to respond to the DOB’s letter.

According to information provided by the DOB, the builder faces two choices: it can revise the design of the mechanical space or it can proceed to build a 25-story tower which had been the original plan the developer had filed with the DOB in 2017. At the time, the proposed tower's relatively modest height, which could have been taller as of right, drew suspicions. Later that year, residents' worst fears were realized when the new design was revealed. In a New York Times story, Gary Barnett, the company's founder, brushed off the concerns, joking that by today's standards, “A 700-footer doesn’t even rank anymore” as a super-tall tower.

The latest decision represents an about face for the DOB. Last year two neighborhood groups filed a challenge against the project, saying that it violated the city’s zoning codes. The measure had the backing of elected officials, including City Councilmember Helen Rosenthal and Borough President Gale Brewer. But in November, the DOB rejected the groups’ argument as invalid.

Back in 2017, when the new design was unveiled, Rosenthal promised her constituents that she would "fight Extell’s current plans with every tool at my disposal."

On Wednesday, Rosenthal celebrated the DOB’s latest decision.

"The Department of Buildings’ notice of intent to revoke the permits for 50 W. 66th Street is a critical first step in the process to overhaul the City’s approach to mechanical voids and ‘super-talls,'" Rosenthal said in a statement. "We are very pleased that the administration is taking this issue so seriously in terms of W. 66th Street, and we await a final decision. Extell now has a limited window of time to respond to the DOB.”

Extell did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It's unclear what ramifications this will have on other buildings with mechanical voids. Early last year, the DOB greenlighted starchitect Rafael Viñoly's Upper East Side apartment building at 249 East 62nd Street which featured a 150-foot mechanical void. In May, Crain's reported that the Department of Planning was considering whether to such designs should be permitted.

"The notion that there are empty spaces for the sole purpose of making the building taller for the views at the top is not what was intended [by the zoning code]," Marisa Lago, director of the Department of City Planning said at a meeting.

Tagged

DOB

Extell

luxury condos

supertalls


Elizabeth Kim

Elizabeth Kim is a reporter on the People and Power desk who covers mayoral power. She previously covered the pandemic, housing, redevelopment and public spaces. A native of Queens, she speaks fluent Mandarin. Got a tip? Email [email protected]

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

Man shot by ICE in NYC still has bullet lodged in neck, attorneys say

Oscar Belgal, a 28-year-old immigrant from the Dominican Republic, was in solitary confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Sunset Park on Monday.

By

Liam Quigley

Published Oct 12, 2026 at 11:37 a.m. ET


NY measles spread prompts 'disaster' emergency. It didn't have to be this way, health commissioner says.

The state health commissioner says the disease outbreak is wholly preventable.

By

Elizabeth Shwe

News

NY measles spread prompts 'disaster' emergency. It didn't have to be this way, health commissioner says.

The state health commissioner says the disease outbreak is wholly preventable.

By

Elizabeth Shwe


NYC wants to move deliveries onto the waterways. It's starting with a 55-year-old boat.

By

Liam Quigley

Inside the luxury Greenpoint high-rise powered by a rumbling generator for over a month

By

David Brand

Mayor Mamdani orders review of NYPD use of force policies

By

Michael Sol Warren


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .