Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Appeals Court Rules Woman Can Sue Boss Who Allegedly Fired Her For Being 'Too Cute'


By

David Colon

Published Aug 23, 2017

Modified Aug 23, 2017


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .


By

David Colon

Published Aug 23, 2017

Modified Aug 23, 2017


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

A New York State appeals court has ruled that a yoga instructor can proceed with a lawsuit which argued that her termination, allegedly because she was "too cute," is covered by gender discrimination laws.

The NY Post reports that a panel of Manhattan judges agreed that Dilek Edwards had a case for a gender discrimination claim after she was fired because her boss allegedly told her she was too attractive.

The case goes back to a 2013 incident in which Edwards, then working at Wall Street Chiropractic as a message therapist and yoga instructor, was fired by her boss Charles Nicolai. According to Edwards, Nicolai told her that his wife would get jealous about her working there because she was "too cute," and a few months later Edwards was fired after getting a text message from Nicolai's wife Stephanie Adams, informing her she was "NOT welcome any longer at Wall Street Chiropractic. DO NOT ever step foot in there again, and stay the [expletive] away from my husband and family!!!!!!! And remember I warned you."

Edwards sued after this, claiming that her firing ran afoul of city and state law prohibiting "appearance-based" discrimination. However, a judge originally ruled that Edwards's termination did not fall under gender discrimination law, and ruled that her suit could be dismissed.

An appeals panel made up of four judges thought differently, ruling that the suit could proceed since Edwards "was fired for no reason other than Adams's belief that Nicolai was sexually attracted to her."

Edwards's lawyer, Maimon Kirschenbaum, said the case sets a legal precedent for good-looking employees. "We had looked extensively to find a case for what should be obvious — that firing a woman because you might be attracted to her is discrimination," Kirschenbaum said after the ruling.

Tagged

Dilek Edwards

lawsuit

sexism


David Colon

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

Remote learning day for NYC schools means remote chance of learning, parents say

The remote day kicked off with a familiar ritual that began in the pandemic: kids struggling to log on.

By

Jessica Gould

Published Nov 3, 2026 at 3:23 p.m. ET


MTA posts record riders over Halloween, marathon week

The numbers highlight the MTA’s continuing post-pandemic recovery as it has campaigned to get people back on the trains after the COVID pandemic.

By

Ramsey Khalifeh

News

MTA posts record riders over Halloween, marathon week

The numbers highlight the MTA’s continuing post-pandemic recovery as it has campaigned to get people back on the trains after the COVID pandemic.

By

Ramsey Khalifeh


Floyd Bennett Field gets $10M for project to reopen historic hangars

By

Rosemary Misdary

Trump administration sends election monitors to NYC, NJ

By

Catalina Gonella

Child dies in raging Upstate New York measles outbreak

By

Caroline Lewis


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .