Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
Judge Okays OWS Class-Action Suit Over NYPD Brooklyn Bridge Arrests
By
Ben Yakas
Published Jun 8, 2012
Modified Jun 9, 2012
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Ben Yakas
Published Jun 8, 2012
Modified Jun 9, 2012
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Last fall, more than 700 Occupy Wall Street protesters were arrested after they marched onto the Brooklyn Bridge. Protesters sued the city, claiming that police lured them onto the roadway of the bridge, leading them there as an excuse to arrest en masse. The NYPD countered that they warned protesters they would be arrested for blocking the street. But yesterday, a federal judge ruled in favor of the protesters, allowing their class-action suit to proceed against the police and commanders involved—but not Mayor Bloomberg or Police Commissioner Ray Kelly.
Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Federal District Court in Manhattan ruled that police wrongly led protesters onto the bridge on Oct. 1st:
“A reasonable officer in the noisy environment defendants occupied would have known that a single bull horn could not reasonably communicate a message to 700 demonstrators,” he wrote, adding that protesters “might infer permission to enter the vehicular roadway from the fact that officers, without offering further warnings, proceeded ahead of and alongside plaintiffs onto that roadway.”
NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said last fall, "This was not a trap. They were warned not to proceed." The day after the protests, police released videos showing an officer with a bullhorn warning protesters that they would be arrested if they did not get off the roadway. But those warnings “could not be heard mere feet away,” the suit claims, and the judge agreed. Rakoff wrote that the police announcement at the foot of the bridge could be heard by only a small percentage of marchers, and as cops began walking up the roadway, they extended to the protesters “an implicit invitation to follow.”
You can see some of the videos from that day here. The protesters' lawsuit also seeks to ban similar measures in the future, and demands that the arrests be expunged and requests unspecified damages. Already, many of those charges have been dismissed outright.
Tagged
activists
arrests
brooklyn bridge
cops
crime
judge
nypd
occupy wall street
ows
police
protests
Ben Yakas
Ben Yakas is a former Gothamist reporter.
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
NYC Council to consider earlier Legionella reporting after deadly outbreaks
A bill facing a hearing Monday would require cooling tower owners to notify city health officials when bacteria levels reach a much lower threshold.
By
Catalina Gonella
Published Oct 18, 2026 at 7:36 p.m. ET
Staten Island fire injures 2, but spares historic 'Godfather' church
Dozens of firefighters responded to the blaze, which started in a vacant warehouse. It was contained within three hours.
By
Giulia Heyward
News
Staten Island fire injures 2, but spares historic 'Godfather' church
Dozens of firefighters responded to the blaze, which started in a vacant warehouse. It was contained within three hours.
By
Giulia Heyward
Bail reform remains major issue in NY governor's race, 7 years after it became law
By
Gino Fanelli
NYPD identifies Bronx man, 26, killed in Midtown subway shooting
By
Ryan Kost
,
Elizabeth Kim
and
Phil Corso
Have you seen this Yorkie? NYPD looking for adorable pup dognapped from her Queens home
By
Ryan Kost
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .