Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
NY Times Asks: Hey, Should We Report The Truth?
By
Ben Yakas
Published Jan 12, 2012
Modified Jan 12, 2012
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Ben Yakas
Published Jan 12, 2012
Modified Jan 12, 2012
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
NY Times public editor Arthur S. Brisbane posed an interesting question in his column today: should the Gray Lady point out when politicians and other officials are clearly lying to us? To figure out whether the "newspaper of record" should report truth in addition to parroting bullshit, they decided to crowdsource the question: "I’m looking for reader input on whether and when New York Times news reporters should challenge “facts” that are asserted by newsmakers they write about."
After citing several examples—including misunderstandings by Clarence Thomas and outright lies by Mitt Romney—Brisbane says many readers fed up "with the distortions and evasions that are common in public life, look to The Times to set the record straight." But even so, he worries about reporters remaining objective while becoming "truth vigilantes," which makes them sound like Robert De Niro's character in Brazil:
Is that the prevailing view? And if so, how can The Times do this in a way that is objective and fair? Is it possible to be objective and fair when the reporter is choosing to correct one fact over another? Are there other problems that The Times would face that I haven’t mentioned here?
It seems the Times is having a hard time understanding that there is a middle ground between manhandling facts and patronizing readers. The column was successful in one regard: sparking a conversation online. It has led to hundreds of angry comments on the Times, as well as all over Twitter and other sites, expressing outrage that such a question was even asked to begin with.
Slate wrote, "Basically everyone on the Internet is slack-jawed and stunned by this entire thing, because, man, “should we print the truth or not” is a hilarious question to just throw out to readers." As Paul Myers tweeted, "Is the NY Times "the paper of record" or just the paper of "Press 'Record' then press 'Play' and transcribe..."?" One such commenter sums up the general mood:
I'll join the chorus here: it's stunning that the New York Times would ask this question. And do it in a slightly negative way: vigilantes are people who take justice into their own hands, often with very unjust results. Reporters don't need to be vigilantes -- they need to be journalists. I've been around a long time, and remember when a reporter's job was to find and present facts, not talking points, and certainly not his or her own opinions or attitude. Is there now a class in journalism school to fine hone snarkiness? I find the debased state of journalism these days to be deeply depressing and dangerous, and the fact that this is even a question at one of the world's better newspapers is a sign of a deeper debasement than I thought. No wonder candidates aren't afraid of lying. And newspapers wonder why people are flocking to the internet?
It doesn't surprise us that they feel the need to engage with their readers on the subject—more and more, reportage has become polarized into he said/she said soundbyte confrontations with little in the way of clarity. The question is: isn't this exactly the kind of issue they should have confronted years ago, like after the Judith Miller debacle?
Tagged
facts
he said/she said
ny times
reporting
truth
Ben Yakas
Ben Yakas is a former Gothamist reporter.
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
New Yorkers are paying $300 million for natural gas they don't even use
A new study found that nearly 2% of the city's natural gas is leaking into the air and causing climate pollution.
By
Rosemary Misdary
Published Oct 14, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. ET
Early Addition: Eric Adams did not convince a Wisconsin town to build a data center
Because the vote against it was unanimous, here are your early links: Jacket weather, swishing your Guinness, spooky decorations in North Jersey and more.
By
James Ramsay
News
Early Addition: Eric Adams did not convince a Wisconsin town to build a data center
Because the vote against it was unanimous, here are your early links: Jacket weather, swishing your Guinness, spooky decorations in North Jersey and more.
By
James Ramsay
Hit-and-run driver arrested trying to flee to Uzbekistan after deadly crash, NYPD says
By
Brittany Kriegstein
NY measles outbreak more widespread than official count, health officials say
By
Caroline Lewis
A NYC judge brought his gun into court for an ‘experiment’. Now he’s censured.
By
Samantha Max
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .