Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
NJ Court Changes Guidelines For Eyewitness IDs, Testimony
By
Chris O'Shea
Published Aug 25, 2011
Modified Aug 25, 2011
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Chris O'Shea
Published Aug 25, 2011
Modified Aug 25, 2011
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
The New Jersey Supreme Court is making some changes that will make it easier for defendants to challenge eyewitness accounts. As more cases shed light on just how unreliable eyewitness testimony can be (two of the "West Memphis Three," who were were recently freed, were convicted based largely on eyewitness testimony), the court is saying that the now 34-year-old guidelines set by the U.S. Supreme Court need an update.
Stuart Rabner, the New Jersey court's chief justice, wrote in a letter about the changes, "From social science research to the review of actual police lineups, from laboratory experiments to DNA exonerations, the record proves that the possibility of mistaken identification is real. Indeed, it is now widely known that eyewitness misidentification is the leading cause of wrongful convictions across the country."
The ruling means that whenever a defendant presents evidence that an eyewitness's testimony is tainted, the judge must hold a hearing and consider factors that might have influenced the account. As you can guess, that can be a lot of things, from time of day, to how much time has passed since the incident, to whether the witness was drunk, and more. When an eyewitness's testimony is disputed, the judge must immediately go over all the factors and present them to the jury. In the past, the judge would still do this, but not every single time.
The decision is likely to have a widespread impact on the nation's judicial system, because New Jersey's Supreme Court is seen as a trend-setter in the criminal law world. Perhaps New Jersey residents can focus on being proud of that, and now maybe put some of the other stuff the state is known for behind them.
Tagged
crime
criminal law
Justice
justice system
new jersey
supreme court
Chris O'Shea
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
3 slates vying to run Jersey City school board as city stares down major tax hikes
The incumbent slate, formerly backed by the teacher's union, lost that influential support over public arguments and controversies.
By
Michael Sol Warren
Published Oct 24, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. ET
5 men charged with trespassing in 2 Manhattan manhole cases
Two people who were found soaking wet and smelling of sewage say they went underground to look for jewelry, according to police and a criminal complaint.
By
Charles Lane
News
5 men charged with trespassing in 2 Manhattan manhole cases
Two people who were found soaking wet and smelling of sewage say they went underground to look for jewelry, according to police and a criminal complaint.
By
Charles Lane
6-year-old girl breaks leg after getting hit by falling bricks in Queens
By
Charles Lane
Mamdani extends ban on permits for new street fairs due to NYPD overtime
By
Carol Chen
Inside the Midtown Bus Terminal rebuild: Decks over Lincoln Tunnel approach, a new park
By
Ramsey Khalifeh
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .