Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Supreme Court Rules Women's Class Action Suit Against Wal-Mart Cannot Proceed


By

Christopher Robbins

Published Jun 20, 2011

Modified Jun 20, 2011


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .


By

Christopher Robbins

Published Jun 20, 2011

Modified Jun 20, 2011


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court tossed out a massive sex-discrimination suit against Wal-Mart, stating that the 1.5 million women who would have been affected by the case may not proceed as a class. The Court ruled that the plaintiff's lawyers, who would have succeeded in trying the largest class action suit in the country's history, "improperly sued under a part of the class action rules that was not primarily concerned with monetary claims, the Times reports. In the related claim of whether or not the plaintiffs proved that "there are questions of law or fact common to the class," the court split along ideological lines 5-4, with Scalia's opinion [pdf] for the majority stating that the plaintiffs failed to prove "a common answer to the crucial question why was I disfavored." (Italics his.)

Citing the "millions of employment decisions" that happen in a company as colossal as Wal-Mart, Scalia rejected the plaintiffs' testimony of a sociologist who studied Wal-Mart's practices and concluded that a "centralized personnel policy" and "allowing subjective decisions by managers in the field" led to fewer promotions and lower wages for women working at Wal-Mart. Writing for the minority, which included all three women justices, Justice Ginsburg pointed to the fact that "women filled 70 percent of the hourly jobs but only 33 percent of management positions," and that, "Managers, like all humankind, may be prey to biases of which they are unaware."

The lawsuit was filed in 2001 by Betty Dukes, who claimed she was denied opportunities to advance within the company despite positive performance reviews. In a press release, Christine Quinn, who is said to be negotiating a deal that may bring Wal-Mart to New York City, said that the Supreme Court's decision "all but assured that many of the plaintiffs in this case will never have their day in Court. Wal-Mart's well-documented history of employee mistreatment needs to be addressed." Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez added, "Although the Court's decision is a miscarriage of justice, all of us must keep fighting wage equality."

Dukes herself predicts that this is only the beginning, telling the Washington Post, "My voice has been heard, but I'm not the only Betty Dukes in this country."

Tagged

antonin scalia

big business

discrimination

ruth bader ginsburg

sexism

supreme court

wal-Mart

walmart


Christopher Robbins

Twitter

Christopher Robbins is a New York City reporter covering transportation, affordable housing, local politics, and criminal justice. His work has also appeared in New York Magazine, The Village Voice and The New York Times. Chris is a graduate of Patrick Henry High School in Roanoke, Virginia, and enjoys biking to Fort Tilden in the summertime.

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

Early Addition: New Jersey considering a ban on chewing gum because of microplastics

Because New Jersey is just trying to keep its people safe, here are your early links: Early voters get a spooky sticker, Tom Hanks returning to Broadway, a time capsule letter to the NYC mayor in 2026 and more.

By

James Ramsay

Published Oct 23, 2026 at 8:48 a.m. ET


Queens mother charged with murdering her son after failed suicide attempt, NYPD says

Sukken Wong, 62, allegedly stabbed her nonverbal son, Byran Wong, 25, to death.

By

Brittany Kriegstein

News

Queens mother charged with murdering her son after failed suicide attempt, NYPD says

Sukken Wong, 62, allegedly stabbed her nonverbal son, Byran Wong, 25, to death.

By

Brittany Kriegstein


Your guide to voting in New York's 2026 elections for governor and Congress

By

Walter Wuthmann

,

Jon Campbell

and

Brigid Bergin

Forest Hills Stadium can keep its concerts under deal with neighbors

By

Ryan Kost

NYC Council to grill Mamdani officials on collapsed Hunts Point Produce Market deal

By

Elizabeth Kim


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .