Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
Debate Over Gawker's "Fair Use" Of Palin Book Excerpts
By
Jen Chung
Published Nov 22, 2010
Modified Nov 22, 2010
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Jen Chung
Published Nov 22, 2010
Modified Nov 22, 2010
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
After Gawker was forced to remove excerpts of Sarah Palin's new book (in stores tomorrow), legal bloggers are looking at the blog's argument that posting over a dozen scanned pages of the books was fair use. The former vice presidential candidate and Alaska governor complained about the leak (questioning the legality), and publisher Harpers Collins sued Gawker, eventually getting a judge to order the site to take them down. Politico's Ben Smith rounded up a few legal bloggers' thoughts...and they seem to back Palin:
: "[M]y initial, very strong, reaction is no, it’s not fair use. There is actually a U.S. Supreme Court opinion remarkably close on the facts. In Harper & Row Publishers v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985), the high court held that Nation magazine’s unauthorized advance publication of excerpts of Gerald Ford’s soon-to-be-released A Time to Heal: The Autobiography of Gerald R. Ford, did not qualify as fair use."
William McGeveran: "Palin was right."
Garry Wise: "Unfortunately for Gawker, they're very likely in the wrong."
And Cornell's William A. Jacobson sees it as an avenue for Palin to go after some of the bloggers who dislike her: "It's called discovery. In a litigation your lawyers are entitled to e-mails, and all Gawker's internal documents regarding not only this theft, but you. Because you will want to prove that their intent was to harm you and damage you, so everything they ever have written off-the-record, everyone with whom they ever have communicated about you, every strategy they have employed to take you down, now is fair game."
Jacobson also advises Palin, "Gawker has given you an opening large enough to drive a truck through. Please go there, if not for yourself, then for all the conservative women who have been targeted by Gawker and the other Gawkers out there."
The Media Law Resource Center's Sandra Baron did tell Smith that forcing Gawker to take down the excerpts before the hearing was unfortunate, "It is a very troubling aspect of the case where in an instance where theoretically what they’re really seeking is to keep someone from eating their lunch, in fact what they’re getting is a pre-trial prior restraint," which could be used by other figures to prevent stories from being run.
Over at The Awl, Eric Spiegelman writes:
Exploiting the headline value of something is kind of central to the Gawker business model. Gawker is regularly accused of all manner of ethical breaches, whether it’s because they post a photo of Brett Favre’s alleged penis or an alleged encounter with Christine O’Donnell’s vagina, or whether it’s because they practice checkbook journalism as a matter of course. But regardless of your feelings about this, if you believe in the sanctity of the First Amendment, that at its heart it commands the government to keep its hands off the press, the Court’s reasoning in the Harper & Row case should give you pause. They’re saying that the Freedom of the Press is reserved for journalists who are polite. You may think that journalism should have a code of conduct, but I bet you’re not terribly comfortable with idea of the government setting that code. And there’s no better test for that than Nick Denton saying as much to the Supreme Court.
Tagged
blogger
fair use
gawker
harper collins
lawsuit
media
sarah palin
Jen Chung
Jen Chung is a former WNYC and Gothamist editor.
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
NY unemployment recipients brace for delays during system upgrade
The shutdown is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. on Monday and last for nine to 12 days.
By
Jon Campbell
and
Carol Chen
Published Oct 30, 2026 at 12:59 p.m. ET
Influential Brooklyn developer illegally raised rents despite tax break, lawsuit claims
The lawsuit targets the leasing practices of the company Two Trees, which recently received a special carveout in the New York state budget.
By
David Brand
News
Influential Brooklyn developer illegally raised rents despite tax break, lawsuit claims
The lawsuit targets the leasing practices of the company Two Trees, which recently received a special carveout in the New York state budget.
By
David Brand
Democrats' early voting lead in NJ keeps growing ahead of Election Day
By
Mike Hayes
Early Addition: Is Harry running?
By
James Ramsay
NYC Council takes key step toward Mamdani's promised Department of Community Safety
By
Ben Feuerherd
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .