Gothamist

A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.

Gothamist

WNYC Listen Live

Donate

 

 

News

Judge: City Doesn't Need to Sift Through WTC Debris for More Remains


By

Jen Chung

Published Jul 8, 2008

Modified Jul 8, 2008


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


Never miss a story

 Email address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .


By

Jen Chung

Published Jul 8, 2008

Modified Jul 8, 2008


Share

FacebookTwitterRedditEmail


We rely on your support to make local news available to all

Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

A federal judge ruled in favor for the city, saying the city is not "required to re-sift through debris" from the World Trade Center in hopes of finding more human remains.

Some families felt the city should go back to Fresh Kills landfill--where almost 2 million tons of debris from the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks were dumped--and go through the tons of debris so they could recover remains for burial. The families, calling themselves the World Trade Center Families for Proper Burial, sued the city and noted that even medical examiner Dr. Charles Hirsch believed there were still remains mixed in with the debris. Some victims' relatives wrote an editorial in the Daily News in February, pointing out FEMA had dedicated $125 million to sift through the debris but the program ended "one year ahead of schedule and $58 million under budget."

However, judge Alvin Hellerstein agreed with the city that it would be impossible to know whether a loved one's remains were at Fresh Kills (according to the NY Times, the city's argument was, "for good or ill, a plaintiff’s property rights to claim a body for burial were predicated on knowing in fact that it belonged to a loved one") given how small the remains might be. Hellerstein said, "Not every wrong can be addressed through the judicial process. The grave harm suffered by the plaintiffs in this case is undeniable. But the jurisdiction of a court is limited."

The city had claimed it had completed the search for WTC remains prior to starting construction at Ground Zero, but some workers found fragments of bone while excavating in 2006, starting a new search for remains and more criticism for the city's approach. And in 2002, NPR visited the sifting efforts at Fresh Kills.

Tagged

burial

Fresh Kills

ground zero

re-sifting

sifting

staten island

world trade center

WTC remains


Jen Chung

Jen Chung is a former WNYC and Gothamist editor.

Read more

Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations


MORE news

DSA to Mamdani: Fire NYPD commissioner if ICE doesn't leave NYC

The DSA's NYC chapter accused the NYPD of collaborating with ICE and demanded Mayor Mamdani hold Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch responsible.

By

Brigid Bergin

,

Elizabeth Kim

and

Ben Feuerherd

Published Oct 9, 2026 at 6:31 p.m. ET


Three people critically injured in Bronx vehicle crash

When officers arrived on the scene in Allerton Friday afternoon, they found three pedestrians who were unconscious with trauma to the head and body, according to the NYPD.

By

Kaya Laterman

News

Three people critically injured in Bronx vehicle crash

When officers arrived on the scene in Allerton Friday afternoon, they found three pedestrians who were unconscious with trauma to the head and body, according to the NYPD.

By

Kaya Laterman


NY will opt in Trump’s school choice program, Hochul says

By

Jon Campbell

Residents, lawmakers warned for months of potential for deadly ICE activity in Marble Hill

By

David Brand

Manhattan DA argues judge shouldn't dismiss state charges against Luigi Mangione

By

Samantha Max


Never miss a story

Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign upEmail address

By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .