Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
West Side Rail Yards Proposals Depress NY Times Critic
By
Jen Chung
Published Nov 25, 2007
Modified Mar 7, 2008
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Jen Chung
Published Nov 25, 2007
Modified Mar 7, 2008
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations

While everyone knows that the proposals five development teams have offered up for the MTA's West Side rail yards are likely to change, the NY Times' architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff made it clear that he hopes they do, with a withering review of the five plans. Noting the great opportunity that developers have, Ouroussoff says the designs "are not just a disappointment for their lack of imagination, they are also a grim referendum on the state of large-scale planning in New York City."
And it gets better: Ouroussoff slams the process of urban planning from the MTA and importance of "profit margins above architecture and planning." (Money is an issue, since developers will have to build something to cover the existing rail yards, a project that could run $1 billion.) He likes the plan from Extell the best and raises the issue of Extell being an underdog (because it doesn't have experience with projects this big) and the likelihood that Extell will be dismissed while lesser proposals with corporations to anchor buildings will be welcomed:
This is not how to build healthy cities. It is a model for their ruin, one that has led to a parade of soulless developments typically dressed up with a bit of parkland, a few commercial galleries and a token cultural institution — the superficial gloss of civilization. As an ideal of urbanism, it is hollow to its core.
Ouch. Let's hope that various powers that be at the MTA - and elected officials and development companies - were reading the paper this weekend. The public has a chance to weigh in on the designs at the display of the models (at a storefront at the northwest corner of East 43rd Street and Vanderbilt Avenue). Below (and after the jump) are some choice observations from Ouroussoff on each of the plans. And check out this 2005 video of Ouroussofff on Charlie Rose, discussing the state of architecture.

- Related Companies' plan "would transform the site into a virtual theme park for Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation" (not a good thing, we take it) and the buildings would create "an imposing barrier between the public park and the rest of the city to the east."

- The Durst Organization and Vornado's joint plan is "slightly less disturbing" than Related's, but the plan's "real precedents are the deadening elevated streets found in late Modernist housing complexes." Deadening is not a good thing!

- Tishman Speyer's design by Helmut "at least seems more honest" (than the Durst-Vornado) but "the design looks like a conventional 1980s mega-development: an oddly retro vision of uniform glass towers set around a vast plaza decorated with a few scattered cafes."

- Brookfield Properties' plan has "real architectural talent" but the talent gives "sophistication without adding much substance." Why? The "retail mall and commercial towers along 10th Avenue" gives "the public park an isolated feel" and a "hotel and retail complex cuts the park in two, so that you lose the full impact of its sweep."

- However, a plan from Extell, one of the supposed underdogs, is the "only one worth serious consideration" for "those who place urban-planning issues above dollars and cents" because it "tries to minimize the impact of the development’s immense scale." Points for its proposal to build a suspension deck - not a platform - over the rail yards which would offer "generous public space and a less brutal assault on the skyline."
See more renderings here. Curbed readers thought the Brookfield design was best, and the Observer also suggested Brookfield was a favorite (the Brookfield design also eliminated the superblocks and "reinstates streets").
Tagged
architecture
arts
As
Charlie Rose
city
City Council
design
durst
Durst/Vornado
Extell
goldman sachs
goldmansachs
hudson yards
models
money
morgan stanley
morganstanley
MTA
new york
new york city
news
news corporation
newscorporation
Nicolai Ouroussoff
nicolaiouroussoff
ny times
parade
related
related companies
rose
rupert murdoch
the city
tishman speyer
tishmanspeyer
urban planning
urbanplanning
vanderbilt avenue
video
vornado
west side
west side rail yards
westsiderailyards
Jen Chung
Jen Chung is a former WNYC and Gothamist editor.
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
Neighborhood 'zoo' of blocked driveways leads New Yorker to boot someone’s parked car
"First of all, why did he even own a boot? That's not something a normal person has."
By
Carol Chen
Published Oct 9, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. ET
Several arrested in wake of ICE protest where Manhattan man was shot in the neck
Oscar Belgal was in his car with his 5-year-old when ICE agents fired seven shots into the vehicle.
By
Brittany Kriegstein
News
Several arrested in wake of ICE protest where Manhattan man was shot in the neck
Oscar Belgal was in his car with his 5-year-old when ICE agents fired seven shots into the vehicle.
By
Brittany Kriegstein
Bronx homeowners facing foreclosure are in the market for assistance
By
Willow Higgins
Cornell students warned of fraternity 'rape culture' years before Jane Doe case
By
Walter Wuthmann
ICE agent fires 7 rounds, shoots man in neck in NYC's Marble Hill, NYPD says
By
Giulia Heyward
and
Arya Sundaram
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .