Gothamist
A non-profit newsroom, powered by WNYC.
Gothamist
Listen Live
News
Cuffing the Shot and Wounded
By
Dave Hogarty
Published Nov 18, 2007
Modified Mar 7, 2008
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Never miss a story
Email address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .
By
Dave Hogarty
Published Nov 18, 2007
Modified Mar 7, 2008
Share
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
We rely on your support to make local news available to all
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. Donate today
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
The New York Times examines the practice of handcuffing prisoners who have been shot by the police, just a few days after the death of Khiel Coppin. The mentally disturbed Brooklyn 18-year-old was handcuffed by cops after they shot him ten times, thinking he was armed with a gun. It turns out, Coppin was armed only with a hairbrush. According to the Times, the practice of handcuffing someone who is already prone and wounded is something that can inflame onlookers who've arrived on the scene following an incident, although there is a rationale behind the practice.
People in and out of law enforcement, including some critics of the Police Department, say there are many reasons for the use of handcuffs in shooting situations, even after the bullets stop flying. It is meant to keep everyone — officers, civilians and the shot person himself — from further harm, in the same way a doctor might have to restrain a patient before administering medicine.
Critics, however, see the handcuffing of a possibly mortally wounded person as a final indignity perpetuated as a form of rough street justice. Another shooting victim who was cuffed as he lay dying was Sean Bell. Lawyer Ron Kuby is a critic of the practice. “Cuffing people after they’ve been shot, or when they’re dead, or when they’re dying is one of the ugliest, most barbaric, unnecessarily horrifying things that the police do, and they do it as a matter of course.” Indeed they have to, if following the procedures outlined in the NYPD's police manual that specifies that injured persons in such situations be cuffed behind their backs. What do you think? Should cops be cuffing people based on their condition, regardless of their state, or is there no point in restraining a dead or severely wounded person?
Tagged
brooklyn
cops
death
gun
handcuffs
Khiel Coppin
khielcoppin
kuby
law
law enforcement
new york
new york times
news
nypd
people
police
police department
ron kuby
sean bell
shooting
shot
The New York
the new york times
The Police
wounded
Dave Hogarty
Read more
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations
MORE news
NYC tow companies busted for ripping off drivers must give $67K in refunds, city says
Mayor Mamdani has expanded enforcement on towing scams, but the unlicensed towing industry remains largely unregulated.
By
Liam Quigley
Published Oct 2, 2026 at 4:47 p.m. ET
Off-duty NYPD officer stabbed in the Bronx, police say
Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Commissioner Jessica Tisch visited the officer in the hospital.
By
Ryan Kost
News
Off-duty NYPD officer stabbed in the Bronx, police say
Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Commissioner Jessica Tisch visited the officer in the hospital.
By
Ryan Kost
DOC negligence factored in death at Rikers' Bellevue hospital outpost, jail officials say
By
Brittany Kriegstein
Conductor on NYC subway that dragged man to death may have skipped safety check, source says
By
Stephen Nessen
NYPD still searching for man who threw burning substance on victim in East Harlem
By
Ryan Kost
Never miss a story
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily.
Sign upEmail address
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms .